Moral Phenomenology and Moral Theory
نویسندگان
چکیده
Appeals to moral phenomenology—the phenomenology of moral experience—are common in moral philosophy, particularly in metaethical inquiry. But as far as we can tell, the topic of moral phenomenology has not typically been center stage—a focus of inquiry in ethics. And so, going back at least to the writings of G. E. Moore (and with some notable exceptions— see below), very little has been written about the nature and significance of moral phenomenology. This is not only the case in connection with metaethical inquiry; the same lack of inquiry is to be found among those whose main interests in ethics are in normative moral theory. As we just mentioned, there are some exceptions—and the exceptions will help us zero in on our target in what we say below. So let us mention two thinkers whose works we will use as a starting point for thinking about moral phenomenology. First, in 1938, philosopher and gestalt psychologist Wolfgang Ko¨hler published The Place of Value in a World of Facts, whose aim was to make sense of the ubiquitous notion of 'requiredness' that is common to logic, scientific inquiry, and what we may just call 'practical inquiry'. All of these fields involve requiredness or what we now call normativity, and Ko¨hler thought that the evolving naturalistic picture of the world that is presented to us by science does not clearly leave a place for normativity. His task was to find a place for it. And his method for doing so was to focus first on providing a phenomenological description of experiences of requiredness. Maurice Mandelbaum's 1955 book, The Phenomenology of Moral Experience, is less grand in scope than is Ko¨hler's—as his title indicates, Mandelbaum is concerned with our moral experiences. But the specific focus of his book is on the phenomenology of moral requiredness and, like Ko¨hler, he makes a case for the methodo-logical priority of phenomenological description in carrying out a certain philosophical project in ethics. While Ko¨hler is concerned with the
منابع مشابه
Moorean Moral Phenomenology
Inquiry into the what-it-is-likeness of concrete moral experience—moral phenomenology—has not generally been part of moral philosophy as practiced in the analytic tradition at least since G. E. Moore’s 1903 Principia Ethica.1 Although there FN:1 have been a few exceptions—including, most notably, Maurice Mandelbaum’s 1955 The Phenomenology of Moral Experience—and although analytic philosophers ...
متن کاملMoral phenomenology: Foundational issues
In this paper, I address the what, the how, and the why of moral phenomenology. I consider first the question What is moral phenomenology?, secondly the question How to pursue moral phenomenology?, and thirdly the question Why pursue moral phenomenology? My treatment of these questions is preliminary and tentative, and is meant not so much to settle them as to point in their answers’ direction.
متن کاملT&F PROOFS NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION 5 Mandelbaum on moral phenomenology and moral realism
In his overlooked 1955 book, The Phenomenology of Moral Experience, Maurice Mandelbaum presented a nuanced moral phenomenology, on the basis of which he defended a kind of moral objectivism, specifically moral realism, against the sorts of non-objectivist views in ethics that were popular in analytic philosophy in the 1940s and early 1950s. A central feature of Mandelbaum's moral phenom-enology...
متن کاملProlegomena to a future phenomenology of morals
Moral phenomenology is (roughly) the study of those features of occurrent mental states with moral significance which are accessible through direct introspection, whether or not such states possess phenomenal character – a what-itis-likeness. In this paper, as the title indicates, we introduce and make prefatory remarks about moral phenomenology and its significance for ethics. After providing ...
متن کاملThe Dual Worlds : Internal and External
Twenty-eight topics in moral science are discussed briefly in this chapter. Some address moral issues that deserve systematic empirical analysis. Experimental studies of obligation and deceit, for example, are rare despite millennia-old concern. Some concern theoretical issues, including phenomenology, conflict/compromise, and deserving theory. Others are more concerned with betterment of the m...
متن کامل